ANTONIO MONTALBÁN Theorem
نویسنده
چکیده
I am interested in studying the complexity of mathematical practice. In mathematics, as we all know, some structures are more complicated than others, some constructions more complicated than others, and some proofs more complicated than others. I am interested in understanding how to measure this complexity and in measuring it. The motivations for this come from different areas. Form a foundational viewpoint, we want to know what assumptions we really need to do mathematics (ZFC is way much more than we usually use), and we are also interested in knowing what assumptions are used in the different areas of mathematics. Form a computational viewpoint, it is important to know what part of mathematics can be done by mechanical algorithms, and, even for the part that can’t be done mechanically, we want to know how constructive are the objects we deal with. Furthermore, it is sometimes the case that this computational analysis allows us to find connections between constructions in different areas of mathematics, and in many cases to obtain a deeper understanding of mathematical objects being analyzed. My work is quite diverse in terms of the techniques I have used, the approaches I have taken, and the areas of mathematics that I have analyzed. However, my background area is Computability Theory, and most of my work can be considered as part of this branch of Mathematical Logic. Inside computability theory, I have worked in various different areas. I have been particularly interested in the programs of Computable Mathematics, Reverse Mathematics and Turing Degree Theory. The former studies the computability aspects of mathematical theorems and structures. The second one analyzes the complexity of mathematical theorems in terms of the complexity of the constructions needed for their proofs. The latter studies the partial ordering induced by the relation “computable from” in an abstract way. I have also written papers in other areas like effective randomness, automata theory, the lattice of Π1-classes, etc.. If I had to choose favorites, tools that are recurrent over my work are the iterations of the Turing jump and hyperarithmetic theory. Structures that are recurrent over my work are linear orderings, well-quasi-orderings and Boolean algebras. In the next three sections I describe my work in each of the areas of Computable Mathematics, Reverse Mathematics, and Turing Degree Theory. The fourth section is dedicated to the part of my work that does not fit in this classification. Each of these sections starts by describing the general ideas of the subject and becomes more technical inside each subsection; for the most part, the reader can skip sections and subsections without loosing in understanding. All my papers are available on my web page at www.math.uchicago.edu/∼antonio.
منابع مشابه
Priority Arguments via True stages
We describe a variation of Ash’s η-system, and give a new proof of Ash’s metatheorem. As an application, we prove a generalization of Ash and Knight’s theorem on pairs of structures.
متن کاملThe Least ∑-jump Inversion Theorem for n-families
Studying the Σ-reducibility of families introduced by [Kalimullin and Puzarenko 2009] we show that for every set X T ∅′ there is a family of sets F which is the Σ-least countable family whose Σ-jump is Σ-equivalent to X ⊕X. This fact will be generalized for the class of n-families (families of families of . . . of sets).
متن کاملThe Slaman-wehner Theorem in Higher Recursion Theory
Slaman and Wehner have independently shown that there is a countable structure whose degree spectrum consists of the nonzero Turing degrees. We show that the analogue fails in the degrees of constructibility. While we do not settle the problem for the hyperdegrees, we show that every almost computable structure, in the sense of Kalimullin, has a copy computable from Kleene’s O.
متن کاملA Robuster Scott Rank
We give a new definition of Scott rank motivated by our main theorem: For every countable structure A and ordinal α < ω1, we have that: every automorphism orbit is Σ α -definable without parameters if and only if A has a Π α+1 Scott sentence, if and only if A is uniformly boldface ∆α-categorical. As a corollary, we show that a structure is computably categorical on a cone if and only if it is t...
متن کاملRod Downey and Antonio Montalbán
This theorem will be used in both constructions, the one of a non-slender thin class, and the one of a slender thin class. The proof starts developing ideas the will be used in both of those constructions. In the case when [T ] is perfect, we will define two tree-embeddings f, r : 2 → S satisfying that for every σ ∈ 2, (fr1) f(σ) ⊆ r(σ), f(σ0) = r(σ)0, f(σ1) = r(σ)1, and (fr2) [Sf(σ)] = [Sr(σ)]...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010